TruckerToTrucker.com - The Best Place on the Web to Buy-Sell Semi Trucks, Semi Trailers, Parts, Equipment!  
Login / Register Trucker Talk Trucker Quick Search   

Sign Up

to have new posts delivered by email.

Enter your email address:


Delivered by FeedBurner

 
Categories
Search Blog
 
 
Powered by
BlogCFM v1.14
08 May 2008
Diesel Fuel Prices Subcommittee Hearing

Diesel Fuel Prices Subcommittee Hearing 

TruckerToTrucker watched every minute of the 4 hour Subcommittee Meeting Chaired by Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-OR.  One had to be impressed by DeFazio's sharp questioning of witnesses and one can surmise that the committee will favor passage of the TRUCC Act known as  H.R.5934 in the House and S 2910 in the Senate.     

Mr. Todd Spencer representing OOIDA was impressive and members can be assured that with a individual of this caliber representing them, that they are getting great value.  His anecdotal story about a trucker receiving only $600 from a broker when the load paid over $1400 was impressive and should be instructive to all truckers to let others know about their difficulties as it can change the way business in conducted.  Spencer used a number of statistics to illustrate the plight of the independent trucker.  Among those were; 

935 companies with 5 or more trucks have gone out of business this year..

96% of trucking companies have 20 or less trucks and 86% have 6 or less trucks.   

Spencer was asked a variety of questions and was authoritative and knowledgeable.  He said that the average trucker has about as much leverage with a broker as a “guy at a payday loan shop.”   

Opposing the TRUCC Act was Robert Voltmann, President of the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA) which represents brokers.  He stated that all fuel surcharges are being passed on to truckers and that the TRUCC Act was not necessary.  He suggested that a “freight recession” was responsible for the demise of so many small truck companies.  Clearly he was unable to articulate a rational position to oppose the TRUCC Act.   

Another witness at the hearing was Michael Card representing the ATA.  He also owns a family trucking company that controls approximately 500 trucks.  He supported the TRUCC Act and presented several other suggestions to the committee to save fuel.  He supported the use of APU's to reduce idling time and suggested the 12% federal excise tax on the APU's be eliminated in an attempt to reduce the cost for the small independent company or owner/operator.  He also suggested that the speed limit should be reduced to 55mph (note 1:this may have been 65 mph- see comments below- the tape will be viewed again to ascertain the exact speed that was quoted and the context of the remarks) (Note 2: I regret the error - he said 65 mph - he did refer to the earlier fuel crisis in the 70's when the speed was reduced at that time to 55 mph).  Finally, he stressed that the EPA Smartway program could be improved.   

TruckerToTrucker urges all to contact their Senator or Representative and request their support for the TRUCC Act.  This is vital legislation that will help all.

Posted by george wilkins at 10:42 AM  |  LINK to this post  |  8 comments  |  Subscribe


Nice report Jim, First let me say I agree with mr Spensors report and I also agree in part with Michael Card, but I fully disagree with Mr Cards asking for the speed limit to be set at 55 mph. It is more than evident that Mr Card has not looked at this from the O/Os point of view. A reduced speed limit will reduce the loads an O/O can take on a weekly basis, it will add to the stress level of both O/Os & Co drivers alike, it will also add to the shrink level & death loss on livestock loads, which in return will mean lower rates but also more waiting time for refer drivers at packing plants. I think the ATA would be better informed if they took the time to research the facts prior to simply asking that all trucks be limited to 55 mph. These are just my views. Dan Little
Posted by Dan Little on May 8, 2008 at 11:04 AM


Dan - actually ATA recommends 65 and in the prepared text submitted by Card he also recommends 65, but as I recall and wrote in my notes in the actual spoken testimony he highlighted the fuel savings available at 55. I'd have to go back and listen to 3 hours of testimony all over again to get to that point as there is no way to fast forward the video available over the Internet. The quality of the sound was not great and I could be mistaken about the 55. I'm going to change this text to reflect 65 as that is the ATA recommendation and I will look at the video again. It is important to note that Card is the owner of a large trucking firm and would probably have different views than a much smaller operation.
Posted by george wilkins on May 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM


Dan - see http://www.truckline.com/NR/exeres/7640E3F7-9993-468B-9E6C-8802784577A8.htm (testimony link is available at the bottom of the page) for the prepared remarks submitted by Card - thank-you for your comments
Posted by george wilkins on May 8, 2008 at 4:30 PM


at 55mph, it puts me to sleep, it's actually dangerous, been there and done that, I'd just as soon not truck. I can live with 65mph, but it does take from your log hours and shut down tim., And if you try to pass and get out of the way, that can be dangerous too, not to mention pissing everybody off.
Posted by karen on May 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM


TruckerToTrucker listened to the testimony once again and Card did say 65mph was the current recommendation. He did refer to the fuel crisis of the 70's when the speed was reduced to 55mph. This caused the confusion.
Posted by george wilkins on May 8, 2008 at 7:03 PM


Thanks George for clearing that up, I have also listened to it but could not make out clearly the 65 mph statement. Please note that the ATA has been pushing to get speed limiters made mandatory, this will be an added expence to O/Os, I stand firmly against speed limiters, I also stand against a mandatory nat. speed limit for calss 8 trucks of 65 mph, this will create split speed limits in several states. All studies have shown that split speed limits add to problems & no where has it been proven they help. I do support the TRUCC Act. I think it will only help to enforce laws that are already on the books. Dan Little
Posted by Dan Little on May 8, 2008 at 8:14 PM


Hey, I just bought new tractor. I found great company which helped me to do it. http://www.truckersservices.com/ Check that one.
Posted by Paul on May 14, 2008 at 8:28 AM


Paul...so what does that have to do with Diesel Fuel Prices Subcommittee Hearing? Do you wish to advertise your new website?
Posted by TruckerJim on May 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM


Name:   Required
Email:   Required your email address will not be publicly displayed.
Your Website:  

Want to receive notifications when new comments are added? Login/join for an account.

Anti-spam key

Type in the text that you see in the above image:

Your comment:

Sorry, no HTML allowed!



Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or join here.

About Us    |   Sitemap    |   Contact Us    |   Privacy Statement    |   Support    |   Want to Buy    |   Helpful Information   |   Advertise    |   Resources